If this guy saved his money and didn’t buy an iPhone he could have purchased a proper camera. There was no need for this guy to show us how stupid he was twice, just telling us he bought the iPhone would have sufficed. Thumbs up for the effor though
I am an amateur photographer, and I am pretty sure that any film marked '120' does not go into any camera marked '35mm' - that is a medium format, pinhole camera and not a 35mm (which refers to film frame size).
I am so bored of the flipping iPhone. It seems even its box is news worthy. Would this be on the reg if it had been built out of any other peice of folded card?
I used to make cardboard cameras about 15 years ago as a kid. This is about as revolutionary as making a wheel out of wood.
As an avid b&w shooter myself, I'd love to know what cheap film brand you're advocating, because 'pro' ilford films are not really at the top of the price range. I mourn my apx and stock every roll I can grab, but the market has shrunk so much I'm happy everytime I find a shop which still stock true b&w film, any brand. Most of the time you find only c-41 chromogenic b&w, and it's a major PITA to work with in my cheap lab.
So, the box the iPhone came in takes a better picture than the iPhone itself. And here was everyone waiting for an upgraded iPhone with a better camera and 3G. The camera upgrade was there all the time!
The 3G bit might need the advanced Blue Peter course though...
is that iPhone itself has a gazillion megapixel camera built in thus the iPhone would actually prove more useful that something in the world, all be it the ONLY something its more useful than, and that that something is the worst idea since Hitler's Dad said to Hitler's Mum "Fancy going upstairs dear, I'm feeling a little saucy".
You are wrong in saying"despite the obvious lack of any megapixels." BW film has a resolution of about 200 lines per mm, which translates to about 100 megapixels for each square inch, or about 500 megapixels for the iHole's 120 film.
Am I correct in saying IKEA have had dibs in this "design" too? Looking at the first image of this contraption, that allen key looks suspiciously like something you'd get in a flat pack....
Canon EOS Rebel T1i Black SLR Digital Camera Kit w/ 18-55mm Lens (15.1MP, SD/SDHC Card Slot)
Nikon D90 Black SLR Digital Camera Kit (12.3MP, 18-105mm, 4288x2848, SD/SDHC Card Slot)
Nikon D3000 SLR Digital Camera Kit w/ 18-55mm Lens (10.2MP, 3x Opt, SDHC Card Slot)
Canon EOS Rebel XSi Black SLR Digital Camera Kit (12.2MP, 4272x2848, SD/SDHC Card Slot)
Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS Grey Digital Camera (10MP, 3x Opt, MMC/MMCplus/SD/SDHC Card Slot)
Man takes old iPhone box, builds film camera
Geoff Thompson
Roll Film #
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 13:55 GMT
Nice article, but it is a roll film camera using 120 film, 60mm not 35mm, just for the record
James Dodd
35mm Film? #
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 13:55 GMT
yea, actually its 120 Film.
Interesting that don't really mention pinhole photography either.
You can make a camera just out of about anything...
Lego, Spam cans, matchbox's etc...
nick turner
impressive #
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 13:55 GMT
he made a 35mm camera using medium format film!
Anonymous Coward
rubbish #
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 13:55 GMT
If this guy saved his money and didn’t buy an iPhone he could have purchased a proper camera. There was no need for this guy to show us how stupid he was twice, just telling us he bought the iPhone would have sufficed. Thumbs up for the effor though
Vladimir Plouzhnikov
In case people didn't notice... #
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 13:55 GMT
The sample photograph in the article is a X-eyed 3D image, by the way.
P
Uhhh ... No. #
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 14:00 GMT
I am an amateur photographer, and I am pretty sure that any film marked '120' does not go into any camera marked '35mm' - that is a medium format, pinhole camera and not a 35mm (which refers to film frame size).
Lotaresco
<sigh> The youth of today #
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 14:00 GMT
That's not 35mm film, that's 120 roll film. Typical of the iPod/Wkipedia GenY market that they can't tell the difference.
sig
It's not a 35mm film camera. #
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 14:00 GMT
It's a 120 format film camera. Or a 60mm film camera. Or a 2 1/2 inch film camera.
Stuart Morrison
Register Hardware’s not convinced it’s revolutionary.. #
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 14:02 GMT
You turn, or 'revolve' the handle to make it work.
It must, therefore, be a revolutionary design.
Quod erat demonstrandum.
lee harvey osmond
Box brownie #
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 14:09 GMT
... I myself would be loading that device with something cheaper than Ilford pro film stock.
Anonymous Coward
Slow news day? #
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 14:10 GMT
I am so bored of the flipping iPhone. It seems even its box is news worthy. Would this be on the reg if it had been built out of any other peice of folded card?
I used to make cardboard cameras about 15 years ago as a kid. This is about as revolutionary as making a wheel out of wood.
Trygve Henriksen
120 / 135 Ilford. #
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 15:48 GMT
Heh...
That's the same film I use in my Lubitel camera(which is a cheap, russian, plastic copy of an English Seagull, which is a knock-off of an... )
There's not that many other choices if you work with B/W 120 film and develop yourself.
I use the 135 stock in my Zenit Horizon, though, and no, there's no possibility of mistaking the two formats...
(Not even blindfolded... Or in a completely dark room... )
Paris Hilton because she likes having her photo taken...
Giles Jones
Box #
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 15:48 GMT
Who would throw the box away? Apple's packaging is attractive in itself.
Plus when you come to sell things, having the box is an advantage.
Anonymous Coward
@osmond : cheap b&w films #
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 15:48 GMT
As an avid b&w shooter myself, I'd love to know what cheap film brand you're advocating, because 'pro' ilford films are not really at the top of the price range. I mourn my apx and stock every roll I can grab, but the market has shrunk so much I'm happy everytime I find a shop which still stock true b&w film, any brand. Most of the time you find only c-41 chromogenic b&w, and it's a major PITA to work with in my cheap lab.
Kevin Mullet
well, I for one think it's neat. #
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 15:48 GMT
boy -- a bunch of sourpusses on the net today.
I, for one, think it's wonderful to take something with a huge digital footprint and make something wonderfully analog out of it.
-KwM-
Mark Jan
Camera Upgrade? #
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 15:48 GMT
So, the box the iPhone came in takes a better picture than the iPhone itself. And here was everyone waiting for an upgraded iPhone with a better camera and 3G. The camera upgrade was there all the time!
The 3G bit might need the advanced Blue Peter course though...
Hedley Phillips
Not a waste of money #
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 15:48 GMT
So the iPhone is good for something after all.
I take it all back.
Karl Lattimer
making a wheel out of wood #
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 15:48 GMT
was far more revolutionary in its day
Sam Millner
What most people fail to realise #
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 15:48 GMT
is that iPhone itself has a gazillion megapixel camera built in thus the iPhone would actually prove more useful that something in the world, all be it the ONLY something its more useful than, and that that something is the worst idea since Hitler's Dad said to Hitler's Mum "Fancy going upstairs dear, I'm feeling a little saucy".
Robert Feldman
1/2 Gigapixel camera #
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 15:48 GMT
You are wrong in saying"despite the obvious lack of any megapixels." BW film has a resolution of about 200 lines per mm, which translates to about 100 megapixels for each square inch, or about 500 megapixels for the iHole's 120 film.
Anonymous Coward
Sheesh... #
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 16:38 GMT
Ignoring the fact I made one of these out of a shoebox aged 9 (I was 9, not the shoebox), I'm wondering why people are getting riled up about this?...
Incidentally, to all the "megapixel" aficionados - you realise pixel count isn't the be all and end all?
Anonymous Coward
title #
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 17:05 GMT
An iHole for an aHole. nuff said
Mark
Will we be seeing... #
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 20:28 GMT
... an Apple Macro?
Jason Aspinall
IKEA? #
Posted Monday 18th February 2008 12:18 GMT
Am I correct in saying IKEA have had dibs in this "design" too? Looking at the first image of this contraption, that allen key looks suspiciously like something you'd get in a flat pack....