Skip to content
THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK
Posted Sunday 29th June 2008 06:37 GMT
SEEMS OBVIOUS YET WHO WANTS 4 8X SLOTS UNLESS YOU use really cheaper cards. As Bandwidth thru pci-e system is determiner, isn't it smarter to make something practicalbe, two 16X slots at 16X?
Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
Login/register to join the discussion
Email
Password
Remember me
• Password reminder
Worth its Jobsian price tag?
Read More…
More…
from $349.99
from $188.99
from $144.99
from $189.99
from $84.99
Intel Core i7 I7-920 Quad Core Processor (2.66GHz, 4x256kB, 4.8GT/s QPI, LGA 1336 Socket B)
AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition Quad Core Processor (3.4GHz, 6MB L3 Cache, 4x512KB L2 Cache, 2000 MHz Bus, Socket AM3)
Asus P7P55D Motherboard (Intel Socket H LGA1156, P55 Express, ATX, 16GB DDR3)
Intel Core i5 750 Qaud Core Processor (2.66GHz, 8MB L3 Cache, 2.5 GT/s Bus, Socket H LGA1156)
Asus M4A785TD-V EVO AMD 785G/SB710 Socket AM3 ATX Motherboard
Intel preps gaming-oriented chipset for 'Nehalem'
THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK
DOES THIS MEAN 2 16x SLOTS AT 16x? #
Posted Sunday 29th June 2008 06:37 GMT
SEEMS OBVIOUS YET WHO WANTS 4 8X SLOTS UNLESS YOU use really cheaper cards. As Bandwidth thru pci-e system is determiner, isn't it smarter to make something practicalbe, two 16X slots at 16X?
Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.