Skip to content
Brian Miller
Posted Thursday 21st August 2008 10:13 GMT
From what I have seen a celeron m 900MHz still wollops the atom 1.6Ghz in terms of performance.
The atom's really clocks are very misleading in terms of performance.
James Pickett (Jp)
Kids eh? Don't know they're born etc . . .
Login/register to join the discussion
Email
Password
Remember me
• Password reminder
Worth its Jobsian price tag?
Read More…
More…
from $1099.00
from $1699.00
from $519.99
from $359.99
from $1169.00
Velocity Micro Edge Z30 Midsize Desktop (2.66GHz Intel Core i5 750, 4GB DDR3, 500GB HDD, DVD±RW DL, Windows Vista Home Premium 64-bit)
Apple iMac All-In-One Desktop (3.06GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 4GB DDR2, 1TB, DVD+-RW DL, Mac OS X v10.5 Snow Leopard, 27" LCD)
HP (Hewlett-Packard) Pavilion p6210f Mini-Tower Desktop (2.6GHz Athlon II X4 620, 6GB DDR2, 640GB HDD, DVD±RW DL, Windows 7 Home Premium)
HP (Hewlett-Packard) Compaq Presario CQ5210F Mini-Tower Desktop (2.7GHz Athlon 64 X2 215, 3GB DDR2, 500GB, DVD±RW DL, Windows 7 Home Premium)
Apple iMac All-In-One Desktop (3.06GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 4GB DDR2, 500GB, DVD+-RW DL, Mac OS X v10.5 Snow Leopard, 21.5" LCD)
Intel Classmate PC turns tablet
Brian Miller
Atom an upgrade???? #
Posted Thursday 21st August 2008 10:13 GMT
From what I have seen a celeron m 900MHz still wollops the atom 1.6Ghz in terms of performance.
The atom's really clocks are very misleading in terms of performance.
James Pickett (Jp)
Old Man Rant . . . #
Posted Thursday 21st August 2008 10:13 GMT
Kids eh? Don't know they're born etc . . .