I've got an eee 701, I love it, it was cheap and the battery's fairly reasonable for its size. It'd be nice if it had integrated HSDPA though...
...which is where this LG would come in. In theory. There's always something horrendously wrong with the portability of these things when you compare features of one with another. Yes, we did want HSDPA, we really did, but what's the point if I can only use it for an hour*?
* I might be underestimating the Atom and ElReg's battery estimation could be wrong...
Too expensive, and has XP rather than Linux. So get to the back of the queue behind all the other manufacturers that don't understand why the EEE 701 was successful.
I love my Eee 701, and I love my Huawei E220, but boy oh boy oh boy does that combination drain power. Battery lie is 3.5 hours standalone, 1.not-much hours on-line. The Eee's charger only just supplies enough power for the combination to use: the battery won't charge at all while connected.
So ... how are LG and other 3G incorporaters going to deal with this? Car battery on wheels?
I remember a number of years ago, the flybook came out (http://www.fliybook.biz) - it had the teeny monitor, good battery lifespan, and came by default with HSDPA/Wifi/Bluetooth/my grandmother (maysherestinpiece) - shame about the 600MHz celeron though, but runs linux like a charm, HSDPA and all. Why is there exactly 0 coverage of what has been an ultra-portable well before the atom? Speaking of which, why aren't flybook atomising their range is completely beyond me, but hey ho...
So yea, laptops with HSDPA have been around for a while now. :P
Paris, because she'd buy me one if I asked nicely enough...
This LG looks fantastic and the bit about Linux is wrong. Whatever you think XP plus 160Gb disk plus really lightweight etc means this will sell in spades. However the smaller it is the more likely it will be lost, left in a cab or pinched. It needs a data protection tool such as Backstopp to make sure all that 160Gb of data does not become somebody else's.
Criticism of the cost is daft because 3 (and all the others soon) are offering £450 against a data contract so to all intents and purposes it will be for nothing, in fact the retailer will make £100odd on the hardware alone so will market this with gusto. Phones 4 u are already doing it. No price complaint surely.
Velocity Micro Edge Z30 Midsize Desktop (2.66GHz Intel Core i5 750, 4GB DDR3, 500GB HDD, DVD±RW DL, Windows Vista Home Premium 64-bit)
Apple iMac All-In-One Desktop (3.06GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 4GB DDR2, 1TB, DVD+-RW DL, Mac OS X v10.5 Snow Leopard, 27" LCD)
HP (Hewlett-Packard) Pavilion p6210f Mini-Tower Desktop (2.6GHz Athlon II X4 620, 6GB DDR2, 640GB HDD, DVD±RW DL, Windows 7 Home Premium)
HP (Hewlett-Packard) Compaq Presario CQ5210F Mini-Tower Desktop (2.7GHz Athlon 64 X2 215, 3GB DDR2, 500GB, DVD±RW DL, Windows 7 Home Premium)
Apple iMac All-In-One Desktop (3.06GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 4GB DDR2, 500GB, DVD+-RW DL, Mac OS X v10.5 Snow Leopard, 21.5" LCD)
LG prices up HSDPA-equipped mini laptop
Shinku
Giveth with one hand... #
Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 10:19 GMT
I've got an eee 701, I love it, it was cheap and the battery's fairly reasonable for its size. It'd be nice if it had integrated HSDPA though...
...which is where this LG would come in. In theory. There's always something horrendously wrong with the portability of these things when you compare features of one with another. Yes, we did want HSDPA, we really did, but what's the point if I can only use it for an hour*?
* I might be underestimating the Atom and ElReg's battery estimation could be wrong...
Alex
SolidState? #
Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 10:37 GMT
Surely this would be easily added to the specs, no? If so, it's a go-er for me!
Ryan
EEEWW #
Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 12:12 GMT
What a cheap-looking finish! Reminds me of an old, OLD Vaio (circa PIII).
Anonymous Coward
mmmm #
Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 12:12 GMT
I'm an LG whore, so this is interesting - shame they wont release a new clam shell phone over here *sigh*
Joe K
Bloody hell #
Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 12:12 GMT
"and the SCC is set to be priced at €399 ($589/£320)"
I stopped reading there.
NEXT!
jai
re: Bloody hell #
Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 12:44 GMT
i stopped reading when i noticed it wasn't being promoted by a scantily clad lass on a beach....
Havin_it
Did anyone else #
Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 13:40 GMT
read that as: "...its own would-be Egg beater"?
Helicopter: the new Sikorsky's got an extra one
druck
Yawn #
Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 15:38 GMT
Too expensive, and has XP rather than Linux. So get to the back of the queue behind all the other manufacturers that don't understand why the EEE 701 was successful.
Ian Johnston
3G power? #
Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 17:39 GMT
I love my Eee 701, and I love my Huawei E220, but boy oh boy oh boy does that combination drain power. Battery lie is 3.5 hours standalone, 1.not-much hours on-line. The Eee's charger only just supplies enough power for the combination to use: the battery won't charge at all while connected.
So ... how are LG and other 3G incorporaters going to deal with this? Car battery on wheels?
Anonymous Coward
been there done that #
Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 19:42 GMT
I remember a number of years ago, the flybook came out (http://www.fliybook.biz) - it had the teeny monitor, good battery lifespan, and came by default with HSDPA/Wifi/Bluetooth/my grandmother (maysherestinpiece) - shame about the 600MHz celeron though, but runs linux like a charm, HSDPA and all. Why is there exactly 0 coverage of what has been an ultra-portable well before the atom? Speaking of which, why aren't flybook atomising their range is completely beyond me, but hey ho...
So yea, laptops with HSDPA have been around for a while now. :P
Paris, because she'd buy me one if I asked nicely enough...
Dave Brooker
Smaller means more likely to be lost #
Posted Friday 29th August 2008 11:20 GMT
This LG looks fantastic and the bit about Linux is wrong. Whatever you think XP plus 160Gb disk plus really lightweight etc means this will sell in spades. However the smaller it is the more likely it will be lost, left in a cab or pinched. It needs a data protection tool such as Backstopp to make sure all that 160Gb of data does not become somebody else's.
Criticism of the cost is daft because 3 (and all the others soon) are offering £450 against a data contract so to all intents and purposes it will be for nothing, in fact the retailer will make £100odd on the hardware alone so will market this with gusto. Phones 4 u are already doing it. No price complaint surely.
Remember, as Shaw Taylor said - keep it safe.