There are rumours that a mysterious Swiss company are working on exploiting the technology involved in the CERN "big bang" experiment which has the potential to create mini, very short lived black holes at will. By using this capability in consumer displays it is believed that contrast levels unachievable with conventional methods can be reached by actively sucking light into the device. Certain practical problems remain in fittiing a giant hadron collider into the average suburban house, and that electicity supply for this device could be of some concern, Also the issue of power consumption in standby mode has not yet been addressed.
It's understood that Prince Charles has expressed his concerns over this development and has suggested that more support should be given to local organisation planning magic lantern displays and it's all a plot by giant corporations.
First gen cine film stock is around 50k-60k:`1. The stuff sent out to cinemas about half of that. Is there any real content with ratios >1M:1? Perhaps the next X-Files will have a visual tone in the range very dark to UFO-propulsion-system black -- and be a big black rectangle when viewed on a laptop.
With only 128 lighting cells, won't there be a haze around bright areas that need stronger backlighting? Some CRT projection TVs had such a haze and it was extremely annoying. There's an instinct to blink and rub your eyes to clear it.
A few years ago, graphics pros wooing and ahhing over the first monitors to take the seemingly bloody obvious step of matching the backlighting to the image, Like what happens by design in those old fashioned CRT's.
<TangentalRant>
The number of creative types that replaced expensive colour accurate CRT's with expensive colour retarded LCD's speaks volumes about their professional values, no doubt by the time LCD's match CRT's for colour they'll have switched to the latest minority report inspired wildly inaccurate hologram tech.
I'm pretty sure modulating the brightness of the LED's is in direct infringement with BrightSide (now Dolby's) Intellectual Property. I went down to London to see the guys at BrightSide over 2.5 years ago. Since then they sold the LED backlit tech to Dolby and made a mint I hope.
...I make a comment about a grammatical error... the error mysteriously disappears, and my comment mysteriously fails to be accepted... coincidence? I guess this one won't be appearing either then. I smell a conspiracy.
For chrissakes, someone saw it and fixed it, Christopher, OK? THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR HELP. File closed, theory debunked, little green men put in a blender and made into milkshakes for the FBI. OK?
Philips pitches black with monster contrast LED backlight
Steven Jones
Negastive Black #
Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 15:38 GMT
There are rumours that a mysterious Swiss company are working on exploiting the technology involved in the CERN "big bang" experiment which has the potential to create mini, very short lived black holes at will. By using this capability in consumer displays it is believed that contrast levels unachievable with conventional methods can be reached by actively sucking light into the device. Certain practical problems remain in fittiing a giant hadron collider into the average suburban house, and that electicity supply for this device could be of some concern, Also the issue of power consumption in standby mode has not yet been addressed.
It's understood that Prince Charles has expressed his concerns over this development and has suggested that more support should be given to local organisation planning magic lantern displays and it's all a plot by giant corporations.
Peter Timon
Most wanted TV #
Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 15:38 GMT
This isn't strictly relevant to the article but why does a European (UK based site) quote rankings and prices from the USA?
Is it too much trouble to differentiate and get stats that might just be useful to the majority of your readers?
This post has been deleted by a moderator
James Paterson
Catchy #
Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 17:28 GMT
Yeah it may be great but what kind of name is 42PFL9803?
Paris, cos she'd be no fun called Human XX44423342Y
Luther Blissett
Marketing histrionics #
Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 17:28 GMT
First gen cine film stock is around 50k-60k:`1. The stuff sent out to cinemas about half of that. Is there any real content with ratios >1M:1? Perhaps the next X-Files will have a visual tone in the range very dark to UFO-propulsion-system black -- and be a big black rectangle when viewed on a laptop.
Dave Harland
It's like a black mirror. #
Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 17:28 GMT
"It's like, how much more black could this be? and the answer is none. None more black."
Anonymous Coward
It's like... #
Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 17:28 GMT
...how much more black could this be?
And the answer is none. None more black.
TimM
How much more black could this be? #
Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 17:28 GMT
The answer is none. None more black.
Kevin McMurtrie
Hazy? #
Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 17:28 GMT
With only 128 lighting cells, won't there be a haze around bright areas that need stronger backlighting? Some CRT projection TVs had such a haze and it was extremely annoying. There's an instinct to blink and rub your eyes to clear it.
jubtastic1
Didn't we see this tech already? #
Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 19:50 GMT
A few years ago, graphics pros wooing and ahhing over the first monitors to take the seemingly bloody obvious step of matching the backlighting to the image, Like what happens by design in those old fashioned CRT's.
<TangentalRant>
The number of creative types that replaced expensive colour accurate CRT's with expensive colour retarded LCD's speaks volumes about their professional values, no doubt by the time LCD's match CRT's for colour they'll have switched to the latest minority report inspired wildly inaccurate hologram tech.
</TangentalRant>
Where is the pfft icon?
Ricky H
IP violation? #
Posted Friday 29th August 2008 02:54 GMT
I'm pretty sure modulating the brightness of the LED's is in direct infringement with BrightSide (now Dolby's) Intellectual Property. I went down to London to see the guys at BrightSide over 2.5 years ago. Since then they sold the LED backlit tech to Dolby and made a mint I hope.
Mark Aggleton
Ponds #
Posted Friday 29th August 2008 07:40 GMT
Can we please not use the word 'puppy' This side of the pond it's a juvenile dog.
TeeCee
Can't....resist...... #
Posted Friday 29th August 2008 07:41 GMT
So, is this thing the New Black then?
Paul
@Peter Timon #
Posted Friday 29th August 2008 10:11 GMT
The price is in Euros.
and Mark Aggleton. What? What is wrong with the word puppy, or wat that a joke?
Anonymous Coward
@IP violation? #
Posted Friday 29th August 2008 11:20 GMT
well if they are licensing the dolby tech then there is no issue.
Isn't it only a violation if they do it that way. if they achieve it by other means then is it ok?
Christopher P. Martin
Interesting... #
Posted Friday 29th August 2008 14:09 GMT
...I make a comment about a grammatical error... the error mysteriously disappears, and my comment mysteriously fails to be accepted... coincidence? I guess this one won't be appearing either then. I smell a conspiracy.
Sarah Bee
Re: Interesting... #
Posted Friday 29th August 2008 14:11 GMT
For chrissakes, someone saw it and fixed it, Christopher, OK? THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR HELP. File closed, theory debunked, little green men put in a blender and made into milkshakes for the FBI. OK?
Jeeeezus.