£4 per GB vs £2.60 per GB for the new OCX Core V2. The OCX V2 boats 170MB/sec read against Intel's 250GB (not proved by punters/reviewers yet) but the OCX trumps Intel's 70MB/sec write with 98MB/sec write, plus it has a USB mini port for firmware upgrades.
I don't see how Intel will compete without a massive price drop soon after launch.
Intel releases laptop, desktop SSDs
Tim Parker
..and the laptop ?..... #
Posted Monday 8th September 2008 22:09 GMT
(come on, the suspense is killing me...)
Tim Parker
Re: ..and the laptop ?..... #
Posted Monday 8th September 2008 22:09 GMT
(missed using the humour icon... this may help)
http://childrensbooks.about.com/od/productreviews/fr/eats_shoots.htm
Gary F
Expensive... #
Posted Monday 8th September 2008 22:09 GMT
£4 per GB vs £2.60 per GB for the new OCX Core V2. The OCX V2 boats 170MB/sec read against Intel's 250GB (not proved by punters/reviewers yet) but the OCX trumps Intel's 70MB/sec write with 98MB/sec write, plus it has a USB mini port for firmware upgrades.
I don't see how Intel will compete without a massive price drop soon after launch.
Andy Barber
WTF... #
Posted Monday 8th September 2008 22:09 GMT
... is "write amplification"
Simon Mirsh
@ Andy Barber #
Posted Tuesday 9th September 2008 08:45 GMT
Write amplification explained...
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2329594,00.asp
Arnold Lieberman
Has been reviewed #
Posted Tuesday 9th September 2008 10:17 GMT
Seems to be very good at database-type applications, not so hot for write performance. But look at the IO performance ;-)
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/Intel-x25-m-SSD,review-31316.html
Now to get the boss to buy a few for "testing" purposes...
b
YUMMY more competition in the SSD space, please! #
Posted Tuesday 9th September 2008 16:02 GMT
the more the merrier..
bring it on, SSD's are about 5 years behind schedule, imo..:)