Having 50 developers and trying to hire 300 more for Android they need that time to find a cubicle for each developer? Seriously - Motorola is a good hardware company but any time it comes to software, they are lost! They still think that headcount is the most important thing in software development and, of course, Six Sigma, etc. So - they will deliver but it takes time.
Why doesn't Motorola do the obvious? Software and more importantly user interface has been the weak spot of Motorola for ages. They went for Symbian, then they went for Linux and Windows Mobile and now Android. What Motorola has never done is to stick up with what they got and what works.
If I would be an executive in Motorola, I would settle to Symbian and S60, use it in all smart phones, tailor and tweak icons, bundle some applications like Fring and throw the mobile with 10 different brothers and sisters of it to consumers... If it works for Nokia it should work with Motorola, but that would be too rational and efficient for them...
Burial stone as they really do deserve to go bankrupt for missing self-evident opportunities for decades.
"If I would be an executive in Motorola, I would settle to Symbian and S60, use it in all smart phones, tailor and tweak icons, bundle some applications like Fring and throw the mobile with 10 different brothers and sisters of it to consumers... If it works for Nokia it should work with Motorola, but that would be too rational and efficient for them..."
Alternatively you could buy a small company with an existing demonstrated competence in producing Symbian OS based Smartphones which has fallen on hard times as a result of a well publicised falling out with Microsoft, invest heavily in them, allow them to work outside the process-heavy, innovation stifling environment the Big M normally does development in, and let them produce a Symbian OS based platform (UIQ based as it happens but that's neither her nor there in these days of touchless UIQ and touch sensitive S60...) which could form the base for a whole generation of products, tailor and tweak the icons, bundle some neat multimedia applications, and launch one or two quite nice products.
Oh, wait a minute that sounds like a sensible strategy. Far better to let existing Motorola product development teams tear the platform (which they've previously either ignored or worked hard at undermining) apart in a feeding frenzy as all and sundry try to establish themselves as stakeholders, shut down the development site you've just spent all that money on, make a significant proportion of the highly talented engineering team you originally bought Sendo^X^X^X^X^Xthe site for redundant, totally demoralise the rest of them and then congratulate selfs on a job well done.
Anonymous, because, well, you never know, one day I may just possibly need the money badly enough that I'd consider taking a contract with Motorola again...
Who cares if it's late to the US ? When will it be in the UK ?
The US is so backwards people are surprised by washer dryers, mobile phone number porting and Windows smart phones (I'm looking at you, Sony Ericcson).
Motorola's navel gazing Android delayed
Tuomo Stauffer
What were you waiting? #
Posted Tuesday 21st October 2008 07:44 GMT
Having 50 developers and trying to hire 300 more for Android they need that time to find a cubicle for each developer? Seriously - Motorola is a good hardware company but any time it comes to software, they are lost! They still think that headcount is the most important thing in software development and, of course, Six Sigma, etc. So - they will deliver but it takes time.
Antidisestablishmentarianist
They still make phones? #
Posted Tuesday 21st October 2008 07:44 GMT
...and soon in combination with Android?
Epic Fail.
Anonymous Coward
Why not do the obvious? #
Posted Tuesday 21st October 2008 09:31 GMT
Why doesn't Motorola do the obvious? Software and more importantly user interface has been the weak spot of Motorola for ages. They went for Symbian, then they went for Linux and Windows Mobile and now Android. What Motorola has never done is to stick up with what they got and what works.
If I would be an executive in Motorola, I would settle to Symbian and S60, use it in all smart phones, tailor and tweak icons, bundle some applications like Fring and throw the mobile with 10 different brothers and sisters of it to consumers... If it works for Nokia it should work with Motorola, but that would be too rational and efficient for them...
Burial stone as they really do deserve to go bankrupt for missing self-evident opportunities for decades.
Anonymous Coward
@Anonymous Coward #
Posted Tuesday 21st October 2008 11:23 GMT
"If I would be an executive in Motorola, I would settle to Symbian and S60, use it in all smart phones, tailor and tweak icons, bundle some applications like Fring and throw the mobile with 10 different brothers and sisters of it to consumers... If it works for Nokia it should work with Motorola, but that would be too rational and efficient for them..."
Alternatively you could buy a small company with an existing demonstrated competence in producing Symbian OS based Smartphones which has fallen on hard times as a result of a well publicised falling out with Microsoft, invest heavily in them, allow them to work outside the process-heavy, innovation stifling environment the Big M normally does development in, and let them produce a Symbian OS based platform (UIQ based as it happens but that's neither her nor there in these days of touchless UIQ and touch sensitive S60...) which could form the base for a whole generation of products, tailor and tweak the icons, bundle some neat multimedia applications, and launch one or two quite nice products.
Oh, wait a minute that sounds like a sensible strategy. Far better to let existing Motorola product development teams tear the platform (which they've previously either ignored or worked hard at undermining) apart in a feeding frenzy as all and sundry try to establish themselves as stakeholders, shut down the development site you've just spent all that money on, make a significant proportion of the highly talented engineering team you originally bought Sendo^X^X^X^X^Xthe site for redundant, totally demoralise the rest of them and then congratulate selfs on a job well done.
Anonymous, because, well, you never know, one day I may just possibly need the money badly enough that I'd consider taking a contract with Motorola again...
Tom Chiverton
Late to the US ? #
Posted Tuesday 21st October 2008 12:18 GMT
Who cares if it's late to the US ? When will it be in the UK ?
The US is so backwards people are surprised by washer dryers, mobile phone number porting and Windows smart phones (I'm looking at you, Sony Ericcson).