My nvidia 768MB 9600 gts that I bought about a year ago is still going strong. I have to play at 1920x1200 (otherwise my monitor decides it needs to stretch the image, even if I run at 960x600 (exactly half) it assumes I'm at 800x600 and I loose the edges.) and it's still good even at high res.
With most of the GFX settings on high the frame rate is occasionally a bit choppy but if you have a monitor that doesn't need such a high res it'll probably be fine. It's definitely playable.
Not very future proof though because nvidia won't do SLI on GTS cards if I read the SLI site properly.
i play alot of high end games as well. i am currently working on: Pure, Far Cry 1 and 2, Bioshock, NFS: Carbon, Most wanted, High Stakes, and Underground 2; Quantum Of Solace, And a few other new just out highly graphical games. i am running the ati 4670 512 gddr3 card, and i have every game on max settings at 2048x1536 on my 22 inch viewsonic. i have YET to hit anything unfer 45 fps. i dont expect anything higher though, whats the point, graphics are smooth @ 30fps. if you went with the 4870 or 4850 series, i think you would be more than adequately covered. if you want to spend the extra bank, def. go for the 4870 x2. great cards. i made the switch from nvidia after the fx 5900 ultra i had on my old agp rig, and i havent looked back since.
Samsung UN55B8000 55" LED TV (Widescreen, 1920x1080, HDTV)
Panasonic VIERA TC-L32X1 32" LCD TV (Widescreen, 1366x768, HDTV)
Panasonic VIERA TC-P50X1 50" Plasma TV (Widescreen, 1366x768, 30,000:1, HDTV)
Samsung LN52B750 52" LCD TV (Widescreen, 1920x1080, HDTV)
Toshiba 32AV502R 32" LCD TV (Widescreen, 1366x768, HDTV)
Which top-of-the-line graphics card should I buy?
Tony Smith, Editor, Reg Hardware
@Ricky #
Posted Wednesday 5th November 2008 16:35 GMT
Some reviews to check out to help you decide:
Bangs-per-buck GPU shoot-out
http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/08/12/review_gpu_bangs_for_buck/
Sapphire 4850 Toxic
http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/09/13/review_sapphire_4850_toxic/
AMD Radeon 4850 and 4870
http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/07/23/review_amd_4850_4870/
GeForce GTX 280
http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/07/09/review_geforce_gtx_280/
This post has been deleted by a moderator
max allan
Nvidia geforce 9600 gts #
Posted Thursday 6th November 2008 17:27 GMT
My nvidia 768MB 9600 gts that I bought about a year ago is still going strong. I have to play at 1920x1200 (otherwise my monitor decides it needs to stretch the image, even if I run at 960x600 (exactly half) it assumes I'm at 800x600 and I loose the edges.) and it's still good even at high res.
With most of the GFX settings on high the frame rate is occasionally a bit choppy but if you have a monitor that doesn't need such a high res it'll probably be fine. It's definitely playable.
Not very future proof though because nvidia won't do SLI on GTS cards if I read the SLI site properly.
Dave
Meh #
Posted Thursday 6th November 2008 23:28 GMT
I would go with the 4870 or 4870 x2, if you want to keep it under 200$ US go with the 4850.
Nvidia's product suffers from faulty manufacturing process.
Be aware.
Jesse
ATI FTW! #
Posted Friday 7th November 2008 11:23 GMT
i play alot of high end games as well. i am currently working on: Pure, Far Cry 1 and 2, Bioshock, NFS: Carbon, Most wanted, High Stakes, and Underground 2; Quantum Of Solace, And a few other new just out highly graphical games. i am running the ati 4670 512 gddr3 card, and i have every game on max settings at 2048x1536 on my 22 inch viewsonic. i have YET to hit anything unfer 45 fps. i dont expect anything higher though, whats the point, graphics are smooth @ 30fps. if you went with the 4870 or 4850 series, i think you would be more than adequately covered. if you want to spend the extra bank, def. go for the 4870 x2. great cards. i made the switch from nvidia after the fx 5900 ultra i had on my old agp rig, and i havent looked back since.