Is having independant drive to left and right wheels safe? What happens when one motor breaks as all things do, it will drive you into the crash barrier 70mph?
"Michelin's in-wheel motors are not unique, of course." #
Posted Monday 16th February 2009 14:57 GMT
Hardly.
Ferdinand Porsche was building cars with in-wheel motors at the beginning of the 20th century. His "System Mixt" comprised a set of batteries to drive the electrics and a petrol engine to recharge them on the run - reminiscent of anything? That ws in 1901...
One of the key components of making a car handle, and ride comfortably is lowering the unsprung weight to ensure the tyre stays in contact with the road as much as possible. I wonder how much mass this system adds to each wheel, and how it affects the ride and handling.
I don't want to see an electric car with a drivetrain, simply chopping out the noisey, messy, dirty, wonderful internal combustion engine and replacing with an oversized starter motor.
I want to see companies doing what they can to really revolutionise the industry with inovative ideas to push forward design, comfort, practicality and easy of use.
Imagine a F430 with no Ferrari engine, but a ferrari electric motor where it should be... What do you gain from the car? Nothing... 1 large motor, same gearbox etc with the same loses and you have to find somewhere for the batteries - and cope with the extra weight.
Now think of the same car with these wheels... Suddenly you have this large engine bay that can be used for something more useful - and you lose all of the inefficiencies of the drive train. The power you have in your engines is the power you have full stop. With permanent 4WD (25% of the power at each corner if you have matching electric motors)
Can't wait to see where designers go with this... (But am so going to mourn the passing of the internal combustion engine when it goes :( )
So - now instead of a new steel spinner and a lump o' rubber when you Clip The Curb With Enthusiasm you'll need to replace five grand of motor and suspension too. Great. Just what we needed.
Couldn't agree more. Once had a Pug 205GTI - lovely when it worked but that wasn't often, and the problems were usually the electrics. A friend had an even worse time with a Citroen that used to lose hydraulics regularly, usually at speed on the motorway so the first thing you knew about it was when you braked and nothing happened. Most annoyingly, the Citroen had an equally unreliable bit of electrickery that was supposed to tell you when the hydraulics had done a Weygand, only that never worked either. Having recently suffered the appalling build quality and awful design of a brand new Citroen Vias courtesy of Hertz there is no way I would ever want a French car again. Let the Germans build the things, let Michelin stick to tyres (my pref is Pirelli anyway, and not just becasue of the calendar).
"Is having independant drive to left and right wheels safe? What happens when one motor breaks as all things do, it will drive you into the crash barrier 70mph?"
So you still use a non-vehicle form of transportation then? Perhaps horse and buggy? Motor vehicles have had independent drives to the left and right wheels for a long time. It's just been done via mechanical means of splitting the engine's torque instead of a motor on each wheel. How do you think your auto can corner on such a tight radius? Hint: it's by applying more "drive" to the outside wheel.
But since you're concerned, allow me to use your own question in relation to non-electric cars: "Is having a driveshift-and-differential-operated vehicle safe? What happens when an axle breaks as all things do, it will drive you into the crash barrier 70mph?" And yes, axles do break. Just ask my cousin who managed to snap the rear axle on his Jeep Wrangler.
If a drive axle breaks power to the ground is lost unless you have a limited slip differential. An open differential will simply spin the broken side twice as fast and not turn the good side at all. This is why vehicles with open diffs get stuck more easily. That said, with traction control being all the rage it hardly makes a difference any more, unless breaking an axle also breaks the traction control scheme of course.
Perhaps I should have been more clear in my post. My comment, which was in response to the first comment ("Safe!"), was an attempt to point out that the failure of one wheel to receive power in an electric "use separate in-wheel motors to drive each wheel independently" vehicle is no more dangerous than the failure of one wheel to receive power in today's "use a drivetrain and differentials to split the power from one engine to drive each wheel independently" vehicle.
Bit disturbed to find that PML are out of administration with the same crew at the helm, those who don't learn from history are destined to repeat it. A wheel is a very vulnerable place to mount a load of motors and bits and pieces, kerbing, the great British pothole and so on will soon do for it and as others have pointed out the repairs will be expensive. Then there is the issue of unsprung weight.
I understood PML were designing for Golf carts, fastest vehicle suitable for in-wheel technology.
Michelin strikes key 'e-wheel' deal
Jimmy Floyd
Pedant? Moi? #
Posted Monday 16th February 2009 14:57 GMT
Actually it's "Vive LA France" - not "le" - the French republic being regarded as a feminine article. And why not...?
Paris. Can't think why.
Jon
Safe! #
Posted Monday 16th February 2009 14:57 GMT
Is having independant drive to left and right wheels safe? What happens when one motor breaks as all things do, it will drive you into the crash barrier 70mph?
Anonymous Coward
Unsprung weight #
Posted Monday 16th February 2009 14:57 GMT
Unsprung weight?
Will this not make some crap handling cars?
Anonymous Coward
"it maybe a Germany company" #
Posted Monday 16th February 2009 14:57 GMT
I certainly hope it is, because when it comes to cars, frogs and electrics just don't mix!
Anonymous Coward
Have you heard of the Siemens 'eCorner' #
Posted Monday 16th February 2009 14:57 GMT
No neither had I...
google.
Anonymous Coward
"Michelin's in-wheel motors are not unique, of course." #
Posted Monday 16th February 2009 14:57 GMT
Hardly.
Ferdinand Porsche was building cars with in-wheel motors at the beginning of the 20th century. His "System Mixt" comprised a set of batteries to drive the electrics and a petrol engine to recharge them on the run - reminiscent of anything? That ws in 1901...
fifi
unsprung weight? #
Posted Monday 16th February 2009 14:57 GMT
One of the key components of making a car handle, and ride comfortably is lowering the unsprung weight to ensure the tyre stays in contact with the road as much as possible. I wonder how much mass this system adds to each wheel, and how it affects the ride and handling.
s
Now this is more like it #
Posted Monday 16th February 2009 14:57 GMT
I don't want to see an electric car with a drivetrain, simply chopping out the noisey, messy, dirty, wonderful internal combustion engine and replacing with an oversized starter motor.
I want to see companies doing what they can to really revolutionise the industry with inovative ideas to push forward design, comfort, practicality and easy of use.
Imagine a F430 with no Ferrari engine, but a ferrari electric motor where it should be... What do you gain from the car? Nothing... 1 large motor, same gearbox etc with the same loses and you have to find somewhere for the batteries - and cope with the extra weight.
Now think of the same car with these wheels... Suddenly you have this large engine bay that can be used for something more useful - and you lose all of the inefficiencies of the drive train. The power you have in your engines is the power you have full stop. With permanent 4WD (25% of the power at each corner if you have matching electric motors)
Can't wait to see where designers go with this... (But am so going to mourn the passing of the internal combustion engine when it goes :( )
John R. Macdonald
Le la le la #
Posted Monday 16th February 2009 14:57 GMT
Quick course on some pitfalls of the French language:
La France refers to the country.
Le France refers to the ship of the same name (i.e. le navire France).
</pedantry>
TeeCee
OMFG! #
Posted Monday 16th February 2009 14:57 GMT
French electrics x 8, exposed to the elements.
Can anyone else see the flaw in this otherwise cunning plan?
Stop, because it will. Frequently. Especially if it rains.
Diccon
@unsprung weight #
Posted Monday 16th February 2009 17:17 GMT
The clever bit of this design is the fact that it includes suspension - thus lessening the impact on unsprung weight.
Their prototype had a unsprung weight of 77lb on the drive axles which compares well with at Renault Clio which comes in at 84lb
nobby
sorry dear, clipped the curb #
Posted Monday 16th February 2009 17:18 GMT
So - now instead of a new steel spinner and a lump o' rubber when you Clip The Curb With Enthusiasm you'll need to replace five grand of motor and suspension too. Great. Just what we needed.
Lionel Baden
@jon #
Posted Monday 16th February 2009 17:18 GMT
Nah wont go madly out fo control into a barrier !
even if only 3 wheels are still driving you should easily be able to control the car (if not please hold the steering wheel with hands(claw) )
and anyway they would easily stick the proggies into it to put power where and when u need it
As for french motors being all bad !!
Common What abou thte 2CV and DS
DS was well before its time
But agree about unsprung weight but from the picture it isnt clear as top wether the motors are mounted before the suspension or not
Matt Bryant
RE: TeeCee #
Posted Monday 16th February 2009 17:18 GMT
Couldn't agree more. Once had a Pug 205GTI - lovely when it worked but that wasn't often, and the problems were usually the electrics. A friend had an even worse time with a Citroen that used to lose hydraulics regularly, usually at speed on the motorway so the first thing you knew about it was when you braked and nothing happened. Most annoyingly, the Citroen had an equally unreliable bit of electrickery that was supposed to tell you when the hydraulics had done a Weygand, only that never worked either. Having recently suffered the appalling build quality and awful design of a brand new Citroen Vias courtesy of Hertz there is no way I would ever want a French car again. Let the Germans build the things, let Michelin stick to tyres (my pref is Pirelli anyway, and not just becasue of the calendar).
Peyton
I'm sure this simplifies overall maintenance #
Posted Monday 16th February 2009 17:18 GMT
But I wonder if hitting a pothole in a car with these would equate to major repairs :\
Chris C
re: Safe! #
Posted Monday 16th February 2009 17:19 GMT
"Is having independant drive to left and right wheels safe? What happens when one motor breaks as all things do, it will drive you into the crash barrier 70mph?"
So you still use a non-vehicle form of transportation then? Perhaps horse and buggy? Motor vehicles have had independent drives to the left and right wheels for a long time. It's just been done via mechanical means of splitting the engine's torque instead of a motor on each wheel. How do you think your auto can corner on such a tight radius? Hint: it's by applying more "drive" to the outside wheel.
But since you're concerned, allow me to use your own question in relation to non-electric cars: "Is having a driveshift-and-differential-operated vehicle safe? What happens when an axle breaks as all things do, it will drive you into the crash barrier 70mph?" And yes, axles do break. Just ask my cousin who managed to snap the rear axle on his Jeep Wrangler.
Eddy Ito
@ Chris C #
Posted Monday 16th February 2009 21:00 GMT
If a drive axle breaks power to the ground is lost unless you have a limited slip differential. An open differential will simply spin the broken side twice as fast and not turn the good side at all. This is why vehicles with open diffs get stuck more easily. That said, with traction control being all the rage it hardly makes a difference any more, unless breaking an axle also breaks the traction control scheme of course.
Chris C
@Eddy Ito #
Posted Tuesday 17th February 2009 12:37 GMT
Perhaps I should have been more clear in my post. My comment, which was in response to the first comment ("Safe!"), was an attempt to point out that the failure of one wheel to receive power in an electric "use separate in-wheel motors to drive each wheel independently" vehicle is no more dangerous than the failure of one wheel to receive power in today's "use a drivetrain and differentials to split the power from one engine to drive each wheel independently" vehicle.
Anonymous Coward
PML Rises Again? #
Posted Tuesday 17th February 2009 12:37 GMT
Bit disturbed to find that PML are out of administration with the same crew at the helm, those who don't learn from history are destined to repeat it. A wheel is a very vulnerable place to mount a load of motors and bits and pieces, kerbing, the great British pothole and so on will soon do for it and as others have pointed out the repairs will be expensive. Then there is the issue of unsprung weight.
I understood PML were designing for Golf carts, fastest vehicle suitable for in-wheel technology.
aery
Nice-post #
Posted Saturday 28th February 2009 11:01 GMT
i love this post........