so it work on roughly the same principle as an insect eye, the fly being the typical example.
I remember a great many innacurate recreations of how the fly sees. That is, the typical camera trick of producing many hexagonal duplicates of the same image, when in actual fact each hexagonal element would have actually been an individual pixel of the same image.
I wouldn't be suprised if DARPA showed an interest in this. The potential for highly discrete cameras with built in redundancy is certainly appealing in a military and espionage content.
Of course, the electronics required to make sense of the image would be the hardest factor to disguise, both in physical dimensions, and transmissions.
Aww, where's my black helicopter? Spose the grenage will have to do
Well, I was going to say: No more turning tha pants inside out to make them last an extra day. But at least we can have fun with bed sheets made out of this material.
OK so you can make a patch of this material. But most fabrics are made of *continuous* fibres. So unless you make the fibre and *cut* each fibre to get its ends free to act as the sensor it will need to bend the fibre at each corner enough to allow light to enter.
If a policeman using one of those backscatter x-ray imagers takes a picture of me through my camera clothes, will he arrest me as a potential terrorist because my clothes snapped him, or not, because he didn't see them in the image?
Anonymous Coward
Shoes #
Posted Friday 10th July 2009 13:24 GMT
How long before someone makes shoes out of this stuff?
Alacrity Fitzhugh
Good for Camouflage #
Posted Friday 10th July 2009 13:24 GMT
If you combine this with the cloth that can display images, you have some primo-grade camo there.
M7S
Walking around in London #
Posted Friday 10th July 2009 13:24 GMT
So the choise is get nicked for being clothed, or going about "indecently"?
Or do only "long lenses" get arrested by paranoid officers fighting terrorism?
Mine will have to be the see through mac then
Graham Marsden
Plod will love this... #
Posted Friday 10th July 2009 13:24 GMT
... Excuse me Sir, but was your jacket taking a photograph of this building which may be of use to terrorists...?
Mine's the 12MP coat...
Chris Paulson
Could be the start of.. #
Posted Friday 10th July 2009 13:24 GMT
Cloaking device. Project image seen on opposite side.
Lottie
Perfect!! #
Posted Friday 10th July 2009 13:24 GMT
Make some PJs out of the stuff and we can PROVE that aliens abduct us at night........
Dick Emery
And... #
Posted Friday 10th July 2009 13:24 GMT
...if a police officer suspects you of being a terrorist taking photos you will be required to take your clothes off!
Anonymous Coward
Who is going to be the first to suggest... #
Posted Friday 10th July 2009 13:24 GMT
... getting Paris H to wear it inside-out...
Psymon
very interesting #
Posted Friday 10th July 2009 13:24 GMT
so it work on roughly the same principle as an insect eye, the fly being the typical example.
I remember a great many innacurate recreations of how the fly sees. That is, the typical camera trick of producing many hexagonal duplicates of the same image, when in actual fact each hexagonal element would have actually been an individual pixel of the same image.
I wouldn't be suprised if DARPA showed an interest in this. The potential for highly discrete cameras with built in redundancy is certainly appealing in a military and espionage content.
Of course, the electronics required to make sense of the image would be the hardest factor to disguise, both in physical dimensions, and transmissions.
Aww, where's my black helicopter? Spose the grenage will have to do
Rock Lobster
PP #
Posted Friday 10th July 2009 13:52 GMT
Paparazzi Paradise
Dennis
What took so long? #
Posted Friday 10th July 2009 21:20 GMT
Taking images with cloth was done centuries ago. Or is the Turin Shroud a modern fake?
So perhaps this should be: Scientists mimic God's camera.
Mine's the one with the religious relics made out of plastic in the pocket.
MyHeadIsSpinning
New Category #
Posted Friday 10th July 2009 21:20 GMT
She Shot Herselve - hot, wet beaver closeups
Dennis
Re: Who is going to be the first to suggest... #
Posted Friday 10th July 2009 21:20 GMT
Well, I was going to say: No more turning tha pants inside out to make them last an extra day. But at least we can have fun with bed sheets made out of this material.
SlackerUK
@Anon Coward #
Posted Friday 10th July 2009 21:20 GMT
Oh come on - we've all seen Paris without her kit on.
SmallYellowFuzzyDuck, how pweety!
But what happens... #
Posted Friday 10th July 2009 21:20 GMT
If they put the camera on underpants and I put the underpants on inside out.
Ewwwwwwwwww!
(Gonna need a big wide angle lense mind *Wink*)
John Smith 19
A small problem #
Posted Friday 10th July 2009 21:20 GMT
OK so you can make a patch of this material. But most fabrics are made of *continuous* fibres. So unless you make the fibre and *cut* each fibre to get its ends free to act as the sensor it will need to bend the fibre at each corner enough to allow light to enter.
It's the start of a neat idea.
Pablo
Be Careful #
Posted Friday 10th July 2009 21:25 GMT
Not to to put it on inside out, because nobody wants to see /that/ picture.
Allan George Dyer
Confused... #
Posted Saturday 11th July 2009 07:50 GMT
If a policeman using one of those backscatter x-ray imagers takes a picture of me through my camera clothes, will he arrest me as a potential terrorist because my clothes snapped him, or not, because he didn't see them in the image?
Mine's the one plugged into the video recorder...
This forum is now closed for new posts.