There will be no need for another Wi-Fi radio, the spec requires that a device can maintain a link an Access Point whilst also running as the group owner or member of a Wi-Fi Direct link.
If this works as intended it could be magic. But, as Mage has inteferred, will the only thing that's different be a far more direct intention to link devices?
It's a shame really that more technology creators don't include "does not suck" in their design specifications.
Perhaps it's time to launch a "Does Not Suck" certification programme, complete with a nice fancy logo and a sticker to go on the box. (I imagine the logo would have to be self-certificated.) Anyone want to have a go at it?
Wi-Fi Alliance readies peer-to-peer wireless tech
sandman
Please... #
Posted Thursday 15th October 2009 13:50 GMT
I for one will welcome the death of bluetooth, please make it happen, quickly would be good.
john.w
Wi-Fi Direct #
Posted Thursday 15th October 2009 13:56 GMT
There will be no need for another Wi-Fi radio, the spec requires that a device can maintain a link an Access Point whilst also running as the group owner or member of a Wi-Fi Direct link.
Mage
Peer to peer #
Posted Thursday 15th October 2009 14:04 GMT
But all WiFi devices support Peer to peer in the spec now...
What will be different?
Steven Hunter
@Mage #
Posted Thursday 15th October 2009 15:05 GMT
I believe that the idea is that it won't suck. But we'll see.
Jimmy Floyd
Impressive potential #
Posted Thursday 15th October 2009 15:05 GMT
If this works as intended it could be magic. But, as Mage has inteferred, will the only thing that's different be a far more direct intention to link devices?
SlabMan
Bonjour! #
Posted Thursday 15th October 2009 15:05 GMT
"how devices can discover nearby compatible gadgets and negotiate connections with them while hiding the complexity from users"
Bonjour! - otherwise known as Zeroconf. Or 'Bonjour matelot' if your name is Kenneth Williams.
Dale 3
@Steven Hunter #
Posted Thursday 15th October 2009 16:15 GMT
It's a shame really that more technology creators don't include "does not suck" in their design specifications.
Perhaps it's time to launch a "Does Not Suck" certification programme, complete with a nice fancy logo and a sticker to go on the box. (I imagine the logo would have to be self-certificated.) Anyone want to have a go at it?
Lou Gosselin
@Does not suck #
Posted Friday 16th October 2009 08:48 GMT
I think that's a good idea.
A does not suck certification program could help counter the crap quality products we're seeing so much of these days.
I'd pay a few bucks more for a does not suck brand, unless it's a vacuum cleaner.