"cost of connectivity is covered through the device price"
“the user doesn’t bear the communications cost,” Iwata said.
"the DSi XL’s price ... could rise as a result"
“it would increase the cost of the hardware"
So which is it Mr Iwata? No comms cost or you pay the comms cost up front with a more epensive device? You can't have it both ways.
And how good will your coverage be in the Highlands of Scotland? Or a remote island somewhere? Why would you're customers pay more for a device if they can't use the features they're paying for because they don't live in a city?
Post: Consistency
Dave Murray
Consistency →
Posted Tuesday 3rd November 2009 13:59 GMT
In Nintendo hints at free DSi 3G connectivity
"cost of connectivity is covered through the device price"
“the user doesn’t bear the communications cost,” Iwata said.
"the DSi XL’s price ... could rise as a result"
“it would increase the cost of the hardware"
So which is it Mr Iwata? No comms cost or you pay the comms cost up front with a more epensive device? You can't have it both ways.
And how good will your coverage be in the Highlands of Scotland? Or a remote island somewhere? Why would you're customers pay more for a device if they can't use the features they're paying for because they don't live in a city?