Agile and waterfall have strengths and weaknesses as highlighted by previous comments.
With either method more emphasis has to be placed on reuse of known good coding patterns, and architectures (with my personal bias preferably Open Source).
Reuse improves quality through iteration, many eyes, and much testing. Given the time available it allows the coder to concentrate more on the overall design, and new code they are writing, reduces the chances of introducing new errors.
Focusing on Security Architecture patterns and controls can also help, www.opensecurity.architecture.org is a good place to start for this topic.
At our local primary school (Broad Hinton, Wilts, UK), they already have this technology. I'm sure if Bill drops down they would give a demo and the name of the supplier. It's running XP by the way...
2 posts • joined Friday 16th May 2008 13:57 GMT
cyberruss
Reuse is key → #
Posted Wednesday 28th May 2008 12:25 GMT
In Too much code, too few application security specialists
Agile and waterfall have strengths and weaknesses as highlighted by previous comments.
With either method more emphasis has to be placed on reuse of known good coding patterns, and architectures (with my personal bias preferably Open Source).
Reuse improves quality through iteration, many eyes, and much testing. Given the time available it allows the coder to concentrate more on the overall design, and new code they are writing, reduces the chances of introducing new errors.
Focusing on Security Architecture patterns and controls can also help, www.opensecurity.architecture.org is a good place to start for this topic.
cyberruss
Already in our local primary school → #
Posted Friday 16th May 2008 14:04 GMT
In Bill Gates unveils interactive wallpaper
At our local primary school (Broad Hinton, Wilts, UK), they already have this technology. I'm sure if Bill drops down they would give a demo and the name of the supplier. It's running XP by the way...