The designated directory enquiries prefix for much of Europe? If I'm ringing for a pizza or a taxi I'm normally in a hurry, but I wouldn't exactly call it an emergency.
Assuming this to be true... well done Google.
Consider this my first and only use of the otherwise-hated FAIL avatar.
Which is why nobody with an iota of sense has paid any attention to hit counters since about 1997. Besides, if that's your game, just use Firefox with ReloadEvery, or just edit your hit counter (most counters worth their salt will let you choose a starting value for the counter anyway).
On the otherhand, if you could parameterise this script to fire off a plethora of connections to your site via different proxys... *mwuhaha* (or maybe a self-constructed DDoS attack - whoops)
Anybody who needs assistance with how to update their Facebook status should probably not be on Facebook in the first place.
Not sure I understand the breakthrough here. Click-recording has been available in SQA tools, including those available as free browser plugins (*cough* Selenium), for years. The difference here is... the text output ("go to www.amazon.com" etc)? In most cases, you could write that stuff down quicker than you could record it, particularly on websites with poor object naming - "click the Go button" is all very well, but what's a user supposed to do when you send them the command "click the btnEDIT052 button"?
oh, and @ 0m50sec: pause, zoom in. Well done to the dev for revealing his gmail address.
Copyright infringement? Hard to say, but I'd still be delighted if they were banned.
"Are the millions of people who have bought ringtones breaking the law if they forget to silence their phones in a restaurant? Under this reasoning from ASCAP, it would be a copyright violation for you to play your car radio with the window down!""
Again, I have no problems with the above being declared illegal / punishable by death.
The main problem with the 'transition tool' - a.k.a the screen which says "Update your privacy settings" - is that by default, there are NO privacy settings applied! See the screenshot below, which shows that all of the settings are defaulted to 'Share with everyone', as opposed to 'Old settings':
Which means that anyone who just clicks through it (or assumes that the default configuration will leave their privacy unchanged) suddenly finds they're sharing their teddy bears with the world. Zuckerberg, despite his protestations, is clearly a very public victim of this.
For a company who have so fundamentally failed to get a grasp on privacy, I guess we shouldn't be surprised that they missed something as fundamental as defaulting to the user's old settings, rather than defaulting to revealing everything to the world.
Expensive, compared to what? Downloading albums illegally? Sure.
If, on the other hand, you want to listen to a whole host of new-release albums without having to shell out £7 a time to find out if they're any good, it makes its money back every single week.
Ironically, your TV license example is a good idea of exactly why Spotify works. How much TV would people actually watch if you had to pay per programme that you wanted to watch? Sure, there'd be some (infrequent TV watchers) who might find it beneficial ("£10 a month to watch TV? Bugger off") but an all-encompassing licence to watch everything on terrestrial telly is much preferable, shirley?
But, to bring the post back to its beginning, it's pretty hard to convince people to switch to a subscription model when they're already used to ripping all their music for free.
Is the Xbox 300 some kind of 360-lite which I haven't heard about?
This is just Microsoft covering its own back, I suppose (and it's not as if they're the first company to take such a stance - see also: Apple's previous Adults-Only rating of dictionary apps). Although from my experience, people fall into one of two camps on this: (1) indignant Mail readers vomiting their disgust about something they're never going to use, or (2) people who just don't care.
Yesterday in Game I saw a kid who must've been about 10 years old, getting his mum to preorder the (18-rated) COD:MW2 for him (which she did), before demanding that she pick it up at tonight's midnight launch. With this sort of thing being rife, it's a wonder that Microsoft even bothers with this sort of initiative.
This smacks of revolution for revolution's sake. Hiding the menubar seems an arbitrary decision at best... they've tried to disguise this by bunging all of the main options onto the 'Tools' menu: https://wiki.mozilla.org/File:Fx-3.7-Tools-Menu-Phase-01.png
'NEW WINDOW' IS NOT A TOOL.
'EXIT' IS NOT A TOOL.
I could go on.
Some of the stuff on that wiki is really frightening: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Menu_cleanup
They're justifying removing menu shortcuts such as Reload, Close Window, Close Tab, or Delete(!), based on the fact that they're "already in the UI". Well yeah, sure, assuming we're all a species of super-users, but there's plenty of people out there who use those menus, particularly for accessibility.
So, time to find a new lightweight browser which focuses on usability and a small footprint, rather than bunging in gimimcky new features... hang on, isn't this why I switched to Firefox in the first place?!
"you have no idea what it's like to be entirely invisible on Google"
I have an idea that adding a question mark won't help. Unless you want to perform some kind of wildcard search. He should've changed his name to Robert Xzvygzax instead.
"This revealed login details for the database behind the site."
Actually, it revealed login details for the database behind *a* site. Not this one. It was a result of exporting/importing blog entries from a previous CMS, and the details would never have allowed access to this new system.
Nice to see Mr Thinks doing good rather than evil though.
The mental £100 barrier? It's all about how you phrase it. El Reg have shamefully gone for the expensive-sounding tactic (hey, why not point out that it's £600 for five years?)
Phrase it a different way. 30p a day to listen to pretty much anything you want (save for the notable exceptions that Michael posted above). Sounds rather more palatable now, doesn't it?
Spotify's service isn't really comparable to last.fm's. Both have their benefits. In Last.fm's case, their offering is more like Pandora; you can stream genre-specific "radio stations", but there's no on-demand listening. Even if you subscribe (pay) to Last.fm - which gives you access to custom playlists etc - you can still only listen to these playlists on shuffle, and there are some very limiting restrictions (each playlist must contain at least 45 tracks by at least 15 different artists).
Spotify is much more about freeing the music; listen to what you want, when you want (and now - where you want!). Sure, £120pa sounds like a scary figure when you start banding it around in headlines, but for instant (legal) access to exactly what you want to hear, it's a small price to pay.
(full disclosure: I'm a subscriber @ Last.fm, AND a subscriber @ Spotify)
Yes, it's annoying that (by default) if you want to press F1, then you have to press Fn-F1. There's a simple switch in the bios to change this though: Advanced -> Function Key Behavior -> Function Key First
I've had the machine for about a month, and it's a solid performer. Games-wise, it might not be bleeding edge, but it's pretty damn competent. (I can easily play Left 4 Dead with the graphics ramped up to the max; the missus can play The Sims 3 without moaning that she can't make out her characters blinking or something like that)
The only small issue for me is keyboard flex - it's noticeable, if not particularly restrictive.
Something doesn't schmell right here. He claims he didn't know the two guys who mugged him? Then why (if you follow the Google car along the entire length of the road) was he cycling merrily alongside them for close to 2 minutes (assuming a 20kph speed limit)?
Still, great to see Big Brother finally scoring a kill (or a wrist-slapping at least). Now we just need the service to become real-time, and we'll all be totally safe.
31 posts • joined Monday 27th April 2009 16:16 GMT
Studley
"turning the key to the online social universe" → #
Posted Wednesday 24th February 2010 20:39 GMT
In Yahoo! turns! Twitter! firehose! on! self!
Sadly, methinks they're not turning the key in the direction I'd hoped.
Studley
Um... 118? → #
Posted Tuesday 23rd February 2010 12:00 GMT
In Nexus One in trigger-happy 999-dialling bother
The designated directory enquiries prefix for much of Europe? If I'm ringing for a pizza or a taxi I'm normally in a hurry, but I wouldn't exactly call it an emergency.
Assuming this to be true... well done Google.
Consider this my first and only use of the otherwise-hated FAIL avatar.
Studley
Unique Visitors → # ↑
Posted Friday 19th February 2010 18:15 GMT
In IBM betas click-recording Firefox add-on
Which is why nobody with an iota of sense has paid any attention to hit counters since about 1997. Besides, if that's your game, just use Firefox with ReloadEvery, or just edit your hit counter (most counters worth their salt will let you choose a starting value for the counter anyway).
On the otherhand, if you could parameterise this script to fire off a plethora of connections to your site via different proxys... *mwuhaha* (or maybe a self-constructed DDoS attack - whoops)
Studley
Share scripts for updating Facebook status? → #
Posted Friday 19th February 2010 11:57 GMT
In IBM betas click-recording Firefox add-on
Anybody who needs assistance with how to update their Facebook status should probably not be on Facebook in the first place.
Not sure I understand the breakthrough here. Click-recording has been available in SQA tools, including those available as free browser plugins (*cough* Selenium), for years. The difference here is... the text output ("go to www.amazon.com" etc)? In most cases, you could write that stuff down quicker than you could record it, particularly on websites with poor object naming - "click the Go button" is all very well, but what's a user supposed to do when you send them the command "click the btnEDIT052 button"?
oh, and @ 0m50sec: pause, zoom in. Well done to the dev for revealing his gmail address.
Studley
Checking out her baps? → #
Posted Friday 29th January 2010 14:01 GMT
In Greenock pensioners cuffed for Tesco 'sex romp'
Obligatory coat picture.
I'm still confused though - they're both claiming the other one started it?
"Nothing like this has happened before." - poor fella
Studley
Obama to scrap moon? → #
Posted Thursday 28th January 2010 19:51 GMT
In Obama to scrap Moon, Mars expeditions - report
WHAT?!
Oh, you've gone for the 'Americanized' comma in the headline.
Please make it stop.
Studley
What's wrong with <strike>? → # ↑
Posted Tuesday 19th January 2010 14:54 GMT
In Windows 7 users to fly without SP parachute
Apart from it being deprecated in HTML 4.0?
Mind you, if that's fair game, let's all start using <blink> and <marquee> too.
Studley
No they don't → # ↑
Posted Tuesday 19th January 2010 12:27 GMT
In Windows 7 users to fly without SP parachute
Windows 2000 - 5.0
Windows XP - 5.1
What's your point exactly?
Studley
I know how they feel → #
Posted Tuesday 12th January 2010 12:39 GMT
In Avatar renders this earthly life meaningless
Ever since The Matrix, I've been ingesting red pills but I'm yet to wake up from this hellish dream-world.
Studley
Infringement? who cares → #
Posted Friday 8th January 2010 00:09 GMT
In US music royalties' collector sues T-Mobile over ringback tones
Copyright infringement? Hard to say, but I'd still be delighted if they were banned.
"Are the millions of people who have bought ringtones breaking the law if they forget to silence their phones in a restaurant? Under this reasoning from ASCAP, it would be a copyright violation for you to play your car radio with the window down!""
Again, I have no problems with the above being declared illegal / punishable by death.
Studley
Default = 'Share with everyone' = fail.gif → #
Posted Monday 14th December 2009 20:04 GMT
In Facebook chief explains bear photo bareness
The main problem with the 'transition tool' - a.k.a the screen which says "Update your privacy settings" - is that by default, there are NO privacy settings applied! See the screenshot below, which shows that all of the settings are defaulted to 'Share with everyone', as opposed to 'Old settings':
http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/375/transition.png
Which means that anyone who just clicks through it (or assumes that the default configuration will leave their privacy unchanged) suddenly finds they're sharing their teddy bears with the world. Zuckerberg, despite his protestations, is clearly a very public victim of this.
For a company who have so fundamentally failed to get a grasp on privacy, I guess we shouldn't be surprised that they missed something as fundamental as defaulting to the user's old settings, rather than defaulting to revealing everything to the world.
Studley
Cheap... → #
Posted Monday 23rd November 2009 19:23 GMT
In Spotify embraces Symbian
@Rob Kendrick:
Expensive, compared to what? Downloading albums illegally? Sure.
If, on the other hand, you want to listen to a whole host of new-release albums without having to shell out £7 a time to find out if they're any good, it makes its money back every single week.
Ironically, your TV license example is a good idea of exactly why Spotify works. How much TV would people actually watch if you had to pay per programme that you wanted to watch? Sure, there'd be some (infrequent TV watchers) who might find it beneficial ("£10 a month to watch TV? Bugger off") but an all-encompassing licence to watch everything on terrestrial telly is much preferable, shirley?
But, to bring the post back to its beginning, it's pretty hard to convince people to switch to a subscription model when they're already used to ripping all their music for free.
Studley
"Reprieve for video steaming"? → #
Posted Friday 13th November 2009 11:15 GMT
In 3UK shapeshifts on traffic shaping
Sounds like a euphemism for the kind of mobile video I'm most interested in.
Studley
Xbox 300? → #
Posted Tuesday 10th November 2009 00:51 GMT
In Xbox 360 Twitter, Facebook clients rated X
(inevitable duplicate post)
Is the Xbox 300 some kind of 360-lite which I haven't heard about?
This is just Microsoft covering its own back, I suppose (and it's not as if they're the first company to take such a stance - see also: Apple's previous Adults-Only rating of dictionary apps). Although from my experience, people fall into one of two camps on this: (1) indignant Mail readers vomiting their disgust about something they're never going to use, or (2) people who just don't care.
Yesterday in Game I saw a kid who must've been about 10 years old, getting his mum to preorder the (18-rated) COD:MW2 for him (which she did), before demanding that she pick it up at tonight's midnight launch. With this sort of thing being rife, it's a wonder that Microsoft even bothers with this sort of initiative.
Studley
New != better → #
Posted Thursday 5th November 2009 12:20 GMT
In Mozilla plots Firefox interface overhaul
This smacks of revolution for revolution's sake. Hiding the menubar seems an arbitrary decision at best... they've tried to disguise this by bunging all of the main options onto the 'Tools' menu: https://wiki.mozilla.org/File:Fx-3.7-Tools-Menu-Phase-01.png
'NEW WINDOW' IS NOT A TOOL.
'EXIT' IS NOT A TOOL.
I could go on.
Some of the stuff on that wiki is really frightening: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Menu_cleanup
They're justifying removing menu shortcuts such as Reload, Close Window, Close Tab, or Delete(!), based on the fact that they're "already in the UI". Well yeah, sure, assuming we're all a species of super-users, but there's plenty of people out there who use those menus, particularly for accessibility.
So, time to find a new lightweight browser which focuses on usability and a small footprint, rather than bunging in gimimcky new features... hang on, isn't this why I switched to Firefox in the first place?!
Studley
Facebook should use "fair comment" as defence → #
Posted Monday 14th September 2009 09:17 GMT
In Boxer sets lawyers on Facebook
because Frank Warren DOES have floppy earlobes and looks like a ****ing rabbit.
Studley
'Smith?'? → #
Posted Tuesday 18th August 2009 12:22 GMT
In Zombie plague analysed by Canadian maths prof
"you have no idea what it's like to be entirely invisible on Google"
I have an idea that adding a question mark won't help. Unless you want to perform some kind of wildcard search. He should've changed his name to Robert Xzvygzax instead.
Studley
Slight typo → #
Posted Friday 14th August 2009 12:40 GMT
In Labour MP exposes password credentials
"This revealed login details for the database behind the site."
Actually, it revealed login details for the database behind *a* site. Not this one. It was a result of exporting/importing blog entries from a previous CMS, and the details would never have allowed access to this new system.
Nice to see Mr Thinks doing good rather than evil though.
Studley
17+ rating for dictionaries? → #
Posted Friday 7th August 2009 09:37 GMT
In Apple denies censoring App Store swear words
mayb that's wots makin da kids so illitrat.
Studley
Am I the only one... → #
Posted Friday 31st July 2009 06:54 GMT
In Sky switches on 3D TV channel in 2010
...who remembers how rubbish 3D glasses were first time around?
How long until Sky announces smell-o-vision integration?
Studley
For that alone, he's got my vote... → #
Posted Wednesday 29th July 2009 11:21 GMT
In Cameron condemns Tweeters as tw*ts
...although he's probably lost an irrationally-high number of votes from Joe Web 2.0.
Studley
Not wanting to engage with Twitter, but.... → #
Posted Wednesday 29th July 2009 09:43 GMT
In Landlord sues tenant over moldy Tweet
http://search.twitter.com/search?q=horizon+realty
How did that move work out for you then, guys?
Studley
Am I the only one... → #
Posted Monday 27th July 2009 23:41 GMT
In IE icon too familiar for Microsoft EU settlement?
...who's oddly intrigued by Browser 6?
Studley
Re: To [sic] expensive → #
Posted Monday 27th July 2009 20:46 GMT
In Spotify: iPhone sideloads for £120 a year, unlimited
The mental £100 barrier? It's all about how you phrase it. El Reg have shamefully gone for the expensive-sounding tactic (hey, why not point out that it's £600 for five years?)
Phrase it a different way. 30p a day to listen to pretty much anything you want (save for the notable exceptions that Michael posted above). Sounds rather more palatable now, doesn't it?
Studley
Re: last.fm → #
Posted Monday 27th July 2009 13:45 GMT
In Spotify: iPhone sideloads for £120 a year, unlimited
Spotify's service isn't really comparable to last.fm's. Both have their benefits. In Last.fm's case, their offering is more like Pandora; you can stream genre-specific "radio stations", but there's no on-demand listening. Even if you subscribe (pay) to Last.fm - which gives you access to custom playlists etc - you can still only listen to these playlists on shuffle, and there are some very limiting restrictions (each playlist must contain at least 45 tracks by at least 15 different artists).
Spotify is much more about freeing the music; listen to what you want, when you want (and now - where you want!). Sure, £120pa sounds like a scary figure when you start banding it around in headlines, but for instant (legal) access to exactly what you want to hear, it's a small price to pay.
(full disclosure: I'm a subscriber @ Last.fm, AND a subscriber @ Spotify)
Studley
Function Keys → #
Posted Tuesday 14th July 2009 09:32 GMT
In Dell Studio 15
Yes, it's annoying that (by default) if you want to press F1, then you have to press Fn-F1. There's a simple switch in the bios to change this though: Advanced -> Function Key Behavior -> Function Key First
I've had the machine for about a month, and it's a solid performer. Games-wise, it might not be bleeding edge, but it's pretty damn competent. (I can easily play Left 4 Dead with the graphics ramped up to the max; the missus can play The Sims 3 without moaning that she can't make out her characters blinking or something like that)
The only small issue for me is keyboard flex - it's noticeable, if not particularly restrictive.
Studley
Schtop! → #
Posted Saturday 20th June 2009 06:39 GMT
In Street View solves Dutch mugging
Something doesn't schmell right here. He claims he didn't know the two guys who mugged him? Then why (if you follow the Google car along the entire length of the road) was he cycling merrily alongside them for close to 2 minutes (assuming a 20kph speed limit)?
Still, great to see Big Brother finally scoring a kill (or a wrist-slapping at least). Now we just need the service to become real-time, and we'll all be totally safe.
Studley
Lib Dems: "Oops! Something is wrong" → #
Posted Thursday 4th June 2009 11:41 GMT
In Tories, LibDems under election day cyberattack?
...would be a pretty good campaign slogan actually.
Presumably their website was overloaded when over six people connected at one time.
Studley
Filling Twitter with useless junk? → #
Posted Thursday 4th June 2009 00:15 GMT
In Hacker disrupts economy of annoying Twitter-based game
So this game launched in 2006 then? And Stephen Fry is the Sheriff of Nottingham?
Evil Bill, because he probably makes £75.39trillion in just 15 minutes
Studley
online petitions never work → #
Posted Friday 29th May 2009 20:10 GMT
In Fans decry tennis gal's breast-slash plan
...thank the lord.
Studley
I hope he's taking requests... → #
Posted Monday 27th April 2009 21:38 GMT
In Musician dumps instruments for iPhone
"Jailbreak" by Thin Lizzy, please.